When it comes to democratic discourse with the populist right, its opacity is commonly highlighted: It uses the meaningless concept of culture and liberal-democratic values, but ultimately imagines a political "we" in anti-human ideologies. It also uses "half-truths" to convince in political discourse. This "diffuse appearance", which is also reflected in a heterogeneous following8 , makes it difficult for opponents to set political differences for a critique of right-wing positions: For to what extent and where is violence already in the language? Where are the boundaries between racism and legitimate criticism, for example of Islam, which is often the focus of right-wing arguments?